Skip to content
FUTURECRAFT
← All Questions

FC / NETWORK

Registry 02 · Question

Question Network

Are we measuring the right things in education? What would we measure if we started over?

A question you cannot put down is already the beginning of the work.

The current measurement stack optimizes for the legibility of students to institutions. A renewed stack would optimize for the legibility of institutions to students, and to the futures both will inhabit.

118 minds · 7 disciplines · Open

Brief / 01

Context record

This is an open Question Network on Futurecraft. Questions, not posts or threads, are the primary unit of intellectual work here. Each question is held by a small, cross-disciplinary working group and remains open until productive contradictions have been mapped, adjacent disciplines have weighed in, and the inquiry has either produced a durable synthesis or been honestly retired.

Working thesis: The current measurement stack optimizes for the legibility of students to institutions. A renewed stack would optimize for the legibility of institutions to students, and to the futures both will inhabit.

The current working group draws from 2 contributors spanning 4 adjacent disciplines, Psychometrics, Apprenticeship, Civic formation. The contradictions listed below are the points where the inquiry is most likely to fracture; they are preserved, not resolved away. Open contributions are by invitation; observers may follow without joining the working group.

Productive Contradictions

  • Selection systems require comparability; comparability resists the very pluralism a renewed measurement stack should encode.
  • Long-horizon outcomes are the only honest measure, and the least funded to track.

Adjacent Disciplines

  • Psychometrics
  • Apprenticeship
  • Civic formation
  • Workforce systems

Working Group

  • Dr. M. RoweCo-Founder · Futurecraft
  • Y. EshaniAssessment research