FC / NETWORK
Registry 02 · Question
Are we measuring the right things in education? What would we measure if we started over?
A question you cannot put down is already the beginning of the work.
The current measurement stack optimizes for the legibility of students to institutions. A renewed stack would optimize for the legibility of institutions to students, and to the futures both will inhabit.
Classification
Open inquiry
Working group active
118 minds · 7 disciplines · Open
Brief / 01
Context record
This is an open Question Network on Futurecraft. Questions, not posts or threads, are the primary unit of intellectual work here. Each question is held by a small, cross-disciplinary working group and remains open until productive contradictions have been mapped, adjacent disciplines have weighed in, and the inquiry has either produced a durable synthesis or been honestly retired.
Working thesis: The current measurement stack optimizes for the legibility of students to institutions. A renewed stack would optimize for the legibility of institutions to students, and to the futures both will inhabit.
The current working group draws from 2 contributors spanning 4 adjacent disciplines, Psychometrics, Apprenticeship, Civic formation. The contradictions listed below are the points where the inquiry is most likely to fracture; they are preserved, not resolved away. Open contributions are by invitation; observers may follow without joining the working group.
Productive Contradictions
- Selection systems require comparability; comparability resists the very pluralism a renewed measurement stack should encode.
- Long-horizon outcomes are the only honest measure, and the least funded to track.
Adjacent Disciplines
- Psychometrics
- Apprenticeship
- Civic formation
- Workforce systems
Working Group
- Dr. M. RoweCo-Founder · Futurecraft
- Y. EshaniAssessment research